Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Facundo Mena vs Jose Pereira Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mena vs Pereira analysis and find out who is favored!
Facundo Mena vs Jose Pereira Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Mena 1 - 3 Pereira
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mena has won 51.41% of points on his second serve, while Pereira has won 47.43%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mena, in recent form, has won 55.23% of his opponent's second serve points, while Pereira has won 51.06%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.18% and 39.01% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mena has saved 60.58% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pereira has saved 61.9% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mena has won 68.83% of matches played (W/L 53/ 24), with Pereira winning 47.73% (W/L 21/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mena has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1). Pereira has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 107/ 65), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 396/ 266).
- Player level: In the last year, Mena has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 78.05% of matches (W/L 32/ 9), where as Pereira has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.52% of matches (W/L 17/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Mena winning 1 times. They have played 9 sets in total, with Mena winning 2 and Pereira winning 7. The last match between Mena and Pereira was at the Brazil F7 (Sao Carlos), 02-11-2018, Quarterfinals, Clay with Facundo Mena getting the victory 7-6(3) 1-6 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:39:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mena and Pereira have played a deciding set 1 times, with Mena winning 1 times and Pereira 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Mena winning 1, and Pereira 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mena has played against opponents with an average rank of 279.65 while Pereira has played against players with an average rank of 225.23.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mena has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pereira has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mena has converted 52.85% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pereira has converted 45.35% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mena 1 - 3 Pereira
340
Rank
127
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total3
0
Hard0
1
Clay3
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
557
Rank
232
High
33
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
57% (466-354)
Career Total W/L
60% (503-331)
67% (24-12)
YTD W/L
48% (11-12)
$140,110
Career Prize Money
$625
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Facundo Mena | Jose Pereira |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 3 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 7 |
| Games Won | 29 | 54 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:39:0 | 0:39:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 46% (53/116) | 77% (74/96) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (37/53) | 64% (47/74) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (30/63) | 55% (12/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 35% (6/17) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (37/96) | 42% (49/116) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 25% (1/4) | 75% (3/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (3/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 1-6 7-5 |
Stats 
Facundo Mena
Player
Jose Pereira
46%
(
53 of
116)
1st Serve %
77%
(
74 of
96)
7
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
47 of
74)
48%
(
30 of
63)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
42%
(
49 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
104
Total Points Won
108
|
||||
| 6-3 7-5 | |||||
| 6-2 6-2 | |||||
| 6-1 6-1 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Facundo Mena | Jose Pereira |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (24/12) | 48% (11/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (51/28) | 47% (24/27) |
| Games Win/Loss | 58% (407/294) | 52% (231/214) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 75% (3/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 66% (21/11) | 48% (10/11) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.42 | 0.24 |
| Aces Total | 144 | 51 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 67 | 41 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:22 | 1:46:37 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 333.78 | 153.61 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (1147/2099) | 68% (1037/1524) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (823/1147) | 63% (653/1037) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (486/952) | 47% (231/487) |
| BPs Won% Total | 55% (138/249) | 45% (78/172) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (1005/2218) | 44% (635/1453) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 58% (11/8) | 53% (8/7) |
| Futures W/L | 76% (13/4) | 38% (3/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (24/36) | 48% (11/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 27% (3/11) | 0% (0/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 60% (3/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 95% (22/21) | 90% (10/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 5% (22/1) | 10% (10/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 21% (14/3) | 15% (13/2) |
Facundo Mena Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Bruno Kuzuhara
Player
Facundo Mena
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
Facundo Mena
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
44%
(
29 of
66)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
47%
(
28 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Karue Sell
54%
(
59 of
110)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
59%
(
30 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
42 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
111
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(7) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Kaichi Uchida
53%
(
39 of
74)
1st Serve %
52%
(
37 of
71)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Leonardo Aboian
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
3-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Facundo Mena
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
77
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
37%
(
25 of
67)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Daniel Antonio Nunez
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Fermin Tenti
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
79%
(
33 of
42)
6
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
53
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Thomas Brown
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jose Pereira Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ergi Kirkin
Player
Jose Pereira
40%
(
38 of
94)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
48%
(
27 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
100
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
Player
Jose Pereira
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jose Pereira
Player
Franco Ribero
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Gonzalo Bueno
Player
Jose Pereira
52%
(
35 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
43%
(
15 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
72%
(
23 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jose Pereira
Player
Alvaro Guillen Meza
80%
(
107 of
134)
1st Serve %
77%
(
88 of
115)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
57%
(
61 of
107)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
48 of
88)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
46%
(
61 of
134)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
55 of
115)
128
Total Points Won
121
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jose Pereira
Player
Hernan Casanova
74%
(
69 of
93)
1st Serve %
73%
(
83 of
113)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
38%
(
8 of
21)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
38 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
56 of
113)
111
Total Points Won
95
|
6-7(4) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jose Pereira
Player
Ignacio Antonio Becerra Otarola
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
21 of
40)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
60
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jose Pereira
Player
Jacob Brumm
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
26 of
49)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jose Pereira
Player
Matt Kuhar
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
59%
(
16 of
27)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
Player
Jose Pereira
68%
(
57 of
84)
1st Serve %
72%
(
60 of
83)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Mena Vs Pereira Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
